NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Hawi & ors (No 15) [2011] NSWSC 1661 Hearing dates: 3 August 2011 Decision date: 04 August 2011 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: R A Hulme J Decision: Evidence not admissible Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - evidence - circumstantial evidence to prove an accused was the user of a particular telephone - probative value outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Mahmoud Hawi Christian Adam Menzies Farres Abounader Ishmail Eken Usama Potrus Zoran Kisacanin David Padovan Representation: Counsel: Ms N Adams with Ms H Roberts (Crown) Mr P Dunn QC with Mr S Grant (Hawi) Mr J Stratton SC (Menzies) Mr J Trevallion (Abounader) Mr P Young SC (Eken) Mr R Driels (Potrus) Mr J Gordon (Kisacanin) Mr A Conwell (Padovan) Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) Sid Hawach & Co (Hawi) Hunter Flood Pty Limited (Menzies) Archbold Legal (Abounader) Purcell Felton Lawyers (Eken) Barakat Lawyers (Potrus) Elie Rahme & Associates (Kisacanin) Nyman Gibson Stewart (Padovan) File Number(s): 2009/50087
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate