NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kerford Developments Pty Ltd v Albury Council [2012] NSWLEC 1020 Hearing dates: 14, 15 November 2011 Decision date: 06 February 2012 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Pearson C Decision: Appeal 10622 of 2011: 1. Appeal dismissed 2. Development application DA 10.2011.390925.1 for a 15 lot residential subdivision is refused. 3. Exhibits are returned except for exhibits B, G and 2. Appeal 10817 of 2011: 1. Appeal dismissed. 2. Application to modify development consent 10.2006.27318.5 granted on 3 March 2008 (as modified) is refused. 3. Exhibits are returned except for exhibits 4 and F. Catchwords: Development application - residential subdivision - impact on threatened species - biodiversity certification Development modification - whether substantially the same development - condition for dedication of land Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 Threatened Species Conservation Amendment (Biodiversity Certification) Act 2010 Albury Local Environmental Plan 2010 Cases Cited: BGP Properties Pty Limited v Lake Macquarie City Council [2004] NSWLEC 399 Bowen v Willoughby City Council [2000] NSWLEC 69 Conquest Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2011] NSWLEC 52 Corowa v Geographe Point Pty Ltd [2007] NSWLEC 121 Kerford Developments Pty Ltd v Albury Council [2011] NSWLEC 154 Maitland City Council v Anambah Homes Pty Ltd (2005) 64 NSWLR 695 Mason Architects v North Sydney Council [1999] NSWLEC 176 Moss v Kiama Council (2003) 127 LGERA 83 Moto Projects (No 2) Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council (1999) 106 LGERA 298 Newcastle & Hunter Valley Speleological Society Inc v Upper Hunter Shire Council & Anor [2010] NSWLEC 48 North Sydney Council v Michael Standley & Associates Pty Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 468 Rutland v Shoalhaven Shire Council (1997) 94 LGERA 370 Silverwater Estate Pty Ltd v Auburn Council [2001] NSWLEC 60 Tipalea Watson Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council (2003) 129 LGERA 351 Vacik Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council (Land and Environment Court, Stein J, 24 February 1992) Wingecarribee Shire Council v Pancho Properties Pty Ltd (2001) 117 LGERA 104 Yu v Ku-ring-gai Council [2004] NSWLEC 569 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kerford Developments Pty Ltd (Applicant) Albury Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr A Bradbury, Williams Love & Nicol (Applicant) Mr M Rogers, Kell Moore (Respondent) Mr I Hemmings (Applicant) Mr M Seymour (Respondent) File Number(s): 10622 of 2011 10817 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate