NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Torchia v Swanton (RLD) [2012] NSWADTAP 5 Hearing dates: 30 November 2011 Decision date: 09 February 2012 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel - Internal Before: M Chesterman, Deputy President Decision: 1. Order 2 in the Tribunal's decision of 2 August 2011 in these proceedings is affirmed. 2. There will be no order for the costs of this appeal unless a party files and serves an application for costs, with supporting submissions, within 21 days. In such event, the opposing party or parties must file and serve submissions in response within a further 21 working days. The question of costs will then be determined 'on the papers', pursuant to section 76 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997. Catchwords: Retail lease - costs - meaning of 'no order as to costs' - failure to apply for costs at hearing - whether 'fair' to make costs order Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Retail Leases Act 1994 Cases Cited: AT v Commissioner of Police, NSW [2010] NSWCA 131 Attorney General v World Best Holdings Ltd (2005) 63 NSWLR 537 B & L Linings Pty Ltd & Anor v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (No 4) (RD) [2008] NSWADTAP 14 Calderbank v Calderbank [1976] Fam 93 Campbelltown City Council v Vegan (2006) 67 NSWLR 372; [2006] NSWCA 284 Chronopoulos v Carossel Pty Ltd [2010] NSWADT 191 Chronopoulos v Carossel Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] NSWADT 236 Cripps v G & M Dawson Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 81 Elite Protective Personnel Pty Ltd v Salmon [2007] NSWCA 322 Grygiel v Baine (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 434 Profilio v Coogee Bay Village Pty Ltd (No 4) [2011] NSWADT 4 Timbarra Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining Ltd & Ors [1999] NSWCA 335 Torchia v Swanton [2010] NSWADT 142 Torchia v Swanton, unreported, Administrative Decisions Tribunal, 5 October 2010 Torchia v Swanton (No 2) [2011] NSWADT 185 Vertzayias v King & Ors [2011] NSWCA 215 Wentworth v Wentworth [1999] NSWSC 638 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Eugene Torchia and Lesley Astill-Torchia (Appellants) Beverley Swanton and Alistair Swanton (Respondents) Representation: Counsel M McCall (Respondents) S Spring (Agent - Appellants) Stephen Tester & Associates (Respondents) File Number(s): 119038 Decision under appeal Citation: Torchia v Swanton (No 2) [2011] NSWADT 185 Date of Decision: 2011-08-02 00:00:00 Before: Retail Leases Division File Number(s): 105054
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate