NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Szanto v Bainton & Ors [2012] NSWSC 60 Hearing dates: Monday, 30 January 2012 Decision date: 30 January 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: White J Decision: Refer to paras [51], and [61]-[63] Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application to set aside orders for security for costs and to strike out statement of claim with only limited leave to replead - rule 36.15 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules - submitted that judgment was given irregularly, illegally or against good faith - plaintiff alleged procedural unfairness, bias or reasonable apprehension of bias, and errors in judgment - held judgment could only be set aside on appeal - substance of complaints considered Legislation Cited: Duties Act 1997 Landlord and Tenant Act 1899 Landlord and Tenant (Amendment) Act 1948 Conveyancing Act 1919 Cases Cited: Szanto v Bainton [2011] NSWSC 985 Perpetual Trustees Australia Limited v Heperu Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2009] NSWCA 387; (2009) 78 NSWLR 190 Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No. 2) [1993] HCA 6; (1993) 176 CLR 300 Szanto v Bainton [2011] NSWSC 278 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Peter Szanto (Plaintiff) Mark Jason Bainton (1st Defendant) Claire Louise Bainton (2nd Defendant) Troy Douglas (3rd Defendant) Nicholas Schmidt (4th Defendant) Representation: Plaintiff in person J Emmett (Defendants) Chapman & Chapman (Defendants) File Number(s): 2010/414171
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate