NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Robert McGill Freier & Anor v Australian Postal Corporation (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 61 Hearing dates: 9 February 2012 Decision date: 17 February 2012 Before: Ball J Decision: 1. The plaintiffs' application for interlocutory relief be dismissed. 2. The costs of the application be the defendant's costs in the cause. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Interlocutory injunction - Application for interlocutory injunction to prevent termination of licensing agreement - Whether there is arguable case - Balance of convenience. CONTRACT - Termination of contract - Interpretation of notice of termination - Termination without cause pursuant to contractual right - Interpretation of notice period. CONSUMER LAW - Unconscionable conduct - Termination of contract with indefinite term - Application of Franchising Code of Conduct - Terminating party's obligation to give reasons for termination under clause 22 of the Franchising Code of Conduct Legislation Cited: Competition & Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 Trade Practices (Industry Codes - Franchising) Regulations 1998 Cases Cited: Al Jadeed TV v United Broadcasting International Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 983; 283 ALR 205 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Allphones Retail Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] FCA 17; 253 ALR 324 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Robert McGill Freier (First Plaintiff) Glenda Letetia Freier (Second Plaintiff) Australian Postal Corporation (Defendant) Representation: A P Cheshire (Plaintiffs) J C Giles (Defendant) Clinch Long Letherbarrow (Plaintiffs) Norton Rose (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/31603
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate