NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Alstom Limited & Ors v Sirakas (No. 2) [2012] NSWSC 64 Hearing dates: 27 and 28 October 2011 Decision date: 15 February 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: White J Decision: Order that the defendant's notice of motion filed on 7 April 2011 be dismissed Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - private international law - application to stay proceedings - whether New South Wales a clearly inappropriate forum - whether parties agreed to submit present disputes to exclusive jurisdiction of Australian courts - whether agreement containing exclusive jurisdiction clause valid under Romanian Law - where parties have agreed that courts of Australia shall have exclusive jurisdiction in respect of substantial parts of the dispute, New South Wales not a clearly inappropriate forum
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application to stay proceedings - where criminal prosecution pending in Romania - guidelines enunciated in McMahon v Gould (1982) 7 ACLR 202 applied - on the facts pendency of criminal investigation in Romania does not warrant stay of civil proceedings Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Voth v Manildra Flour Mills Pty Ltd [1990] HCA 55; (1990) 171 CLR 538 Alstom Limited & Ors v Sirakas [2010] NSWSC 669 Paramasivam v Flynn [1998] FCA 1711; (1998) 90 FCR 489 Murakami v Wiryadi [2010] NSWCA 7; (2010) 268 ALR 377 FAI General Insurance Co Ltd v Ocean Marine Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association (1997) 41 NSWLR 559 Pacific Carriers Ltd v BNP Paribas [2004] HCA 35; (2004) 218 CLR 451 Comandate Marine Corp v Pan Australia Shipping Pty Ltd [2006] FCAFC 192; (2006) 157 FCR 45; (2006) 238 ALR 457 Mackender v Feldia AG [1967] 2 QB 590 Lazard Bros & Co v Midland Bank Limited [1933] AC 289 Williams v Usher [1955] HCA 60; (1955) 94 CLR 450 F & K Jabbour v Custodian of Israeli Absentee Property [1954] 1 WLR 139 McMahon v Gould (1982) 7 ACLR 202 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Alstom Limited (1st Plaintiff) Alstom Power Romania SRL ACN J4018785/1992 (2nd Plaintiff) Alstom General Turbo SA ACN J40/26837/1994 (3rd Plaintiff) George Sirakas (Defendant) Representation: C Harris SC (Plaintiffs) A Scotting with S Chapple (Defendant) Colin Biggers & Paisley (Plaintiffs) Verekers Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2009/291651
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate