NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Akkawi v R; Akkawi v R [2012] NSWCCA 11 Hearing dates: 29 November 2011 Decision date: 17 February 2012 Before: Simpson J at [1] Blanch J at [103] Rothman J at [104] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal, allow the appeal, and re-sentence the applicants as follows: Mark Akkawi: Count 1: imprisonment for 5 years and 6 months, commencing on 29 May 2008 and expiring on 28 November 2013, with a non-parole period of 3 years and 3 months, expiring on 28 August 2011; Count 2: (taking into account the Form 1 offences) imprisonment for 6 years, commencing on 29 May 2009 and expiring on 28 May 2015, with a non-parole period of 4 years, expiring on 28 May 2013. Paul Akkawi: Count 1: imprisonment for 5 years and 6 months, commencing on 29 May 2008 and expiring on 28 November 2013, with a non-parole period of 3 years and 3 months, expiring on 28 August 2011; Count 2: imprisonment for 6 years, commencing on 29 May 2009 and expiring on 28 May 2015, with a non-parole period of 4 years, expiring on 28 May 2013; Count 3: (taking into account the Form 1 offences) imprisonment for 6 years, commencing on 29 August 2011 and expiring on 28 August 2017, with a non-parole period of 2 years and 9 months, expiring on 28 May 2014. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application for leave to appeal against sentences - pleas of guilty - aggravated detain for advantage - kidnapping - robbery in company - discharging a firearm with intent to cause grievous bodily harm - manifestly excessive sentences - special circumstances - parity of sentencing - aggregate non-parole periods - mental health - psychiatric illness - specific deterrence - s33A(1)(a) Crimes Act 1900 - s 86(2)(a) Crimes Act 1900 - s 97(1) Crimes Act 1900 - Pt 3 Div 3 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - s 9 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - s 11 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - s 44 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45 R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 R v Israil [2002] NSWCCA 255 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; 49 NSWLR 383 Thomson v R; Moody v R [2010] NSWCCA 124 Williams v R; Saunders v R [2006] NSWCCA 33 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mark Akkawi (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Paul Akkawi (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel S Hanley SC (Mark Akkawi) G Turnbull SC (Paul Akkawi) F Veltro (Respondent) Solicitors Jack Rigg Solicitors (Mark Akkawi) Jack Rigg Solicitors (Paul Akkawi) Directors of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 09/5903; 09/5904 Decision under appeal Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 2010-12-03 00:00:00 Before: Colefax DCJ File Number(s): 09/5903; 09/5904
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate