NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Viavattene v Morton [2011] NSWSC 1682 Hearing dates: 15 December 2011 Decision date: 19 December 2011 Before: Schmidt J Decision: 1. The orders sought be refused. 2. The motion be stood over, pending determination of the appeal. 3. Mr and Mrs Viavattene must bear the defendants' costs of the hearing, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - notice of motion - orders sought refused - costs Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Supreme Court Act 1970 Uniform Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Peter Viviattene v Bruce Morton (Supreme Court of New South Wales, McCallum J, 27 May 2011, unreported) Peter Viviattene v Bruce Morton (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Kirby J, 7 June 2011, unreported) Peter Viviattene v Bruce Morton (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Davies J, 19 July 2011, unreported)) Peter Viviattene v Bruce Morton (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Latham J, 19 September 2011, unreported) Peter Viviattene v Bruce Morton (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Latham J, 22 September 2011, unreported) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Beverley Viavattene (First Plaintiff) Peter Viavattene (Second Plaintiff) Bruce Morton (First Defendant) Evelyn Birch (Second Defendant) Representation: Mr T Lynch (Defendants) Ms Viavattene (unrepresented) Ellis & Baxter Solicitors (Defendants) File Number(s): 2011/162069 and 2011/152708
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate