NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: RSW v R [2012] NSWCCA 13 Hearing dates: 15 November 2011 Decision date: 27 February 2012 Before: Whealy JA at [1] Simpson J at [58] Hislop J at [80] Decision: 1. Appeal against conviction is dismissed. 2. Leave to appeal against sentence is granted. 3. Appeal against sentence is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME - Appeal - conviction - aggravated sexual assault - whether the jury verdict was unreasonable - SKA v R.
CRIME - Appeal - sentence - whether the sentence was manifestly excessive - utility of sentencing statistics. Legislation Cited: - Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) - s 61J, s 61M - Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) - s 44 Cases Cited: - Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 - House v King (1936) 55 CLR 499 - M v R [1994] HCA 63; (1994) 181 CLR 487 - MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53; 213 CLR 606 - Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 - SKA v R [2011] HCA 13; 85 ALJR 571 Category: Principal judgment Parties: RSW (Appellant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M. Thangaraj SC (Appellant) Ms N. Noman (Crown) Solicitors: Ms M.A. Voncina (Appellant) S.C. Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2008/010693 Publication restriction: Non-publication order re complainant Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Citation: R v RW Date of Decision: 2009-03-27 00:00:00 Before: Finnane QC DCJ File Number(s): 2008/010693
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate