NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Environment Protection Authority v Pipeline Drillers Group Pty Ltd [2012] NSWLEC 18 Hearing dates: 2, 3 May 2011 Decision date: 20 February 2012 Jurisdiction: Class 5 Before: Craig J Decision: Proceedings 50036/10 1. The defendant is convicted of the offence against s 120(1) of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 as charged. 2. The defendant is fined the sum of $18,000. Proceedings 50037/10 3. The defendant is convicted of the offence against s 120(1) of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 as charged. 4. The defendant is fined the sum of $12,000. In respect of both offences 5. Within 28 days from the date of this order and at its expense, the defendant is to place a quarter page notice in the first six pages of the 'Port Macquarie News' newspaper and a third page notice in the 'Australian Pipeliner' in the form of Annexure 'A' to this order (pursuant to s 250(1)(a) of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997) 6. Within 35 days of this order, the defendant is to provide to the prosecutor a copy of the notices published in the publications in accordance with order 5. 7. The defendant must pay the prosecutor's costs, as agreed, in the sum of $29,469, such sum to be paid within three months from the date of this order. 8. Pursuant to s 248(1) of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, the defendant must pay the prosecutor's investigation expenses, as agreed, in the sum of $14,531, such sum to be paid within three months from the date of this order. 9. Exhibits may be returned. Catchwords: ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENCE - pollution - s 120(1) of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 - sewage pipeline installation - wetland area - horizontal directional drilling - discharge of bentonite slurry from drilling operation - reasonably foreseeable risk of harm - two unintentional offences - immediate containment and clean-up - actual harm - impact confounded by unassociated works in the vicinity - harm believed to be low and short term - no prior conviction - guilty plea - assistance to authorities - parity - costs - totality principle - publication. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 Cases Cited: Axer Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 113 LGERA 357 Bentley v BGP Properties Pty Ltd [2006] NSWLEC 34; (2006) 145 LGERA 234 Camilleri's Stock Feeds Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 32 NSWLR 683 Environment Protection Authority v Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd [2008] NSWLEC 280; (2008) 163 LGERA 71 Environment Protection Authority v Coe Drilling Australia Pty Ltd [2005] NSWLEC 719 Garrett v Freeman (No 3) [2009] NSWLEC 1; (2009) 164 LGERA 287 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 Veen v The Queen (No. 1) ;1979 HCA 7; (1979) 143 CLR 458 at 490 Category: Sentence Parties: Environment Protection Authority (Prosecutor) Pipeline Drillers Group Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Mr P Barley (Solicitor) (Prosecutor) Mr T G Howard (Defendant) Gordon Plath, Environment Protection Authority (Prosecutor) HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 50036 of 2010 50037 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate