NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Derbas v R [2012] NSWCCA 14 Hearing dates: 7 December 2011 Decision date: 21 February 2012 Before: Meagher JA at [1] Hoeben J at [48] Rothman J at [49] Decision: (1) The appeal be allowed. (2) Orders 1, 2, 3 and 4 made on 24 February 2011 be set aside. (3) There be no access to the document headed "Application for Part 5 Search Warrant/Record of Application" dated 23 November 2008 and signed by Detective Paul O'Neill as applicant which was produced in answer to a subpoena to produce documents addressed to the Registrar of the Local Court, Mt Druitt. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - leave to appeal against interlocutory order - public interest immunity - application for production of a document disclosing confidential police informer - balancing exercise - common law applied - whether disclosure of identity of informer would assist accused in defence - relevance of potential consequences to informer if identity disclosed - claim to immunity from production upheld Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Evidence Act 1995 Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Regulation 2005 Cases Cited: Air Canada v Secretary of State for Trade [1983] 2 AC 394 Alister v The Queen [1984] HCA 85; (1984) 154 CLR 404 Attorney General for New South Wales v Chidgey [2008] NSWCCA 65; (2008) 182 A Crim R 536 Attorney-General for New South Wales v Stuart (1994) 34 NSWLR 667 Australian Securities and Investment Commission v P Dawson Nominees Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 123; (2008) 247 ALR 646 Cain v Glass (No. 2) (1985) 3 NSWLR 230 Carroll v Attorney General for New South Wales) (1993) 70 A Crim R 162 D v National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children [1978] AC 171 DPP v Smith (1996) 86 A Crim R 308 Haydon v Magistrates Court of South Australia [2001] SASC 65; (2001) 87 SASR 448 Jarvie v Magistrates' Court of Victoria at Brunswick [1995] 1 VR 84 Marks v Beyfus (1890) 25 QBD 494 R v Abdullah & Ors [1999] NSWCCA 188 R v Carey (1990) 20 NSWLR 292 R v McKelliff [2004] SASC 63; (2004) 87 SASR 476 R v Mason (2000) 77 SASR 105; (2000) 112 A Crim R 266 R v Meissner (1994) 76 A Crim R 81 R v Saleam (1989) 16 NSWLR 14 R v Werner Paul Roberts [2004] VSCA 1; (2004) 9 VR 295 Sankey v Whitlam (1978) 142 CLR 1 State of New South Wales v Public Transport Ticketing Corporation [2011] NSWCA 60 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Attorney General for New South Wales (Appellant) Mohammed Ali Derbas (First Respondent) The Queen (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms M England (Appellant) Mr M Thangaraj SC (First Respondent) Solicitors: I V Knight, Crown Solicitor (Appellant) B Sandland, Legal Aid NSW (First Respondent) File Number(s): 2008/00069987 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-02-24 00:00:00 Before: King DCJ File Number(s): 2008/69987
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate