NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: SOCARES Support Group Inc v Cessnock City Council [2012] NSWLEC 23 Hearing dates: 6 - 7 February 2012 Decision date: 21 February 2012 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Pain J Decision: 1. The Applicant's summons filed on 15 September 2011 is dismissed. 2. Costs are reserved. Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW - whether council decision not to tender for pound services in breach of tender obligations in Local Government Act 1993 - whether council could be satisfied of exceptions to requirement to tender contract for services - whether council satisfied of extenuating circumstances or unavailability of competitive or reliable tenders - whether mandatory relevant considerations not taken into account by council - whether irrelevant considerations taken into account by the council - grounds of judicial review not established by the applicant which bears the onus of proof Legislation Cited: Companion Animals Act 1998 Pt 7 Impounding Act 1993 Pt 2, s 21 Local Government Act 1993 s 55, s 626(1) Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979 s 5, s 34A Cases Cited: Alexander v Yass Council [2011] NSWLEC 148 Foley v Padley [1984] HCA 50; (1984) 154 CLR 349 Gee v Council of the City of Sydney [2004] NSWLEC 581 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZGUR [2011] HCA 1; (2011) 241 CLR 594 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZJSS [2010] HCA 48; (2010) 243 CLR 164 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng [2001] HCA 17; (2001) 205 CLR 507 Schroders Australia Property Management Ltd v Shoalhaven City Council [2001] NSWCA 74 Tonkin v Cooma-Monaro Shire Council [2006] NSWCA 50; (2006) 145 LGERA 48 Walsh v Parramatta City Council [2007] NSWLEC 255; (2007) 161 LGERA 118 Texts Cited: Concise Oxford Dictionary Macquarie Dictionary Category: Principal judgment Parties: SOCARES Support Group Inc (Applicant) Cessnock City Council (Respondent) Representation: Ms F Berglund (Applicant) Dr J Griffiths SC with Ms M Allars (Respondent) University of Newcastle Legal Centre (Applicant) Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 40845 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate