NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: LYSLE v R [2012] NSWCCA 20 Hearing dates: 10 February 2012 Decision date: 29 February 2012 Before: Basten JA at [1] RS Hulme J at [2] Schmidt J at [52] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: Criminal law - sexual assault - inconsistency of verdicts - rule in Browne v Dunn Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Dungay v R [2010] NSWCCA 82 Llewellyn v R [2011] NSWCCA 66 MFA v R (2002) 213 CLR 606 MWJ v R [2005] HCA 74; (2006) 80 ALJR 329 Picker v R [2002] NSWCCA 78 R v Abdallah [2001] NSWCCA 506; (2001) 127 A Crim R 46 R v Banic [2004] NSWCCA 322 R v Dennis [1999] NSWCCA 23 R v Scott [2004] NSWCCA 254 RWB v R [2010] NSWCCA 147 TK v R [2009] NSWCCA 151 Category: Principal judgment Parties: LYSLE, John Francis Regina Representation: C: F Veltro A: C Loukas C: S Kavanagh A: Legal Aid Commission File Number(s): 2009/10889 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2010-07-21 00:00:00 Before: Payne DCJ File Number(s): 2009/10889
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate