NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: V & M Davidovic Pty Limited v Professional Services Group t/as Rosier Partners Lawyers [2012] NSWSC 134 Hearing dates: 14 February 2012 Decision date: 29 February 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Application to set aside statutory demand dismissed. Plaintiff to pay Defendant's costs. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - Winding up - statutory demand - Court lacks jurisdiction to set aside statutory demand where application to set aside and supporting affidavit not filed and served within time - Whether offsetting claim established. Legislation Cited: - Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Pt 5.4, ss 459G, 459G(3), 459H, 459H(1)(a), 459H(1)(b), 459H(2), 459H(5), 459J(1)(b), 109X - Evidence Act (NSW) s 160 - Federal Court Rules 071 r 36B (repealed) - Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) - Supreme Court (Corporations) Rules 1999 (NSW) - Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) ss 368, 369 Cases Cited: - Arcade Badge Embroidery Co Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2005] ACTCA 3; (2005) 157 ACTR 22 - Autumn Solar Installations Pty Ltd v Solar Magic Australia Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 463 - Beauty Health Group Ltd v Scholl [2011] NSWSC 77 Central City Pty Ltd v Montevento Holdings Pty Ltd [2011] WASCA 5 - Commercial Union Assurance Co of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 - CP York Holdings Pty Ltd v Food Improvers Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 409 - Chadwick Industries (South Coast) Pty Ltd v Condensing Vaporisers Pty Ltd (1994) 13 ACSR 37 - D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid (2005) 223 CLR 1 - David Grant & Co Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation [1995] HCA 43; (1995) 184 CLR 265 - Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Clear Blue Developments Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1223 - Eyota Pty Ltd v Hanave Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACSR 785 - Elm Financial Services Pty Ltd v MacDougal [2004] NSWSC 560 - Energy Equity Corporation Ltd v Sinedie Pty Ltd [2006] WASCA 419; 166 FLR 179 - Grass Manufacturers Pty Ltd v Sraennik Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 95 - Graywinter Properties Pty Ltd v Gas & Fuel Corp Superannuation Fund (1996) 70 FCR 452; 21 ACSR 581; 14 ACLC 1703 - Hasmar Investments Pty Ltd v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd [2007] NSWSC 103; (2007) 61 ACSR 321; 25 ACLC 282 - Howship Holdings Pty Ltd v Leslie (1996) 41 NSWLR 542 - Independent Portable Buildings Pty Ltd v Modular Building Systems Pty Limited [2011] FCA 511 - Kay Investment Holdings Pty Ltd v North East Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) [2011] NSWSC 1121; (2011) 85 ASCR 610 - Ketrim Pty Ltd v AS&L Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 1046; (2004) 52 ACSR 252 - King Furniture Australia Pty Ltd v Higgs [2011] NSWSC 234 - Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd [2011] HCA 11; (2011) 243 CLR 361; 85 ALJR 533 - Macleay Nominees Pty Ltd v Belle Property East Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 743 - Meehan v Glazier Holdings Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 24; (2005) 53 ACSR 229 - Mibor Investments Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1994] 2 VR 290; (1993) 13 ACSR 37 Panel Tech Industries (Australia) Pty Ltd v Australian Skyreach Equipment Pty Ltd (No 2) [2003] NSWSC 896 - Parklands Blue Metal Pty Ltd v Kowari Motors Pty Ltd [2003] QSC 98; [2004] 1 Qd R 140 - Pearlburst Pty Ltd v Summers Resort Group Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1126 - Portrait Express (Sales) Pty Ltd v Kodak (Australasia) Pty Ltd (1996) 20 ACSR 746 - POS Media Online Ltd v B Family Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 147; (2003) 21 ACLC 533 - Royal Premier Pty Ltd v Taleski [2001] WASCA 48 Saferack Pty Ltd v Marketing Heads Australia Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1317 - Scanhill Pty Ltd v Century 21 Australasia Pty Ltd (1993) 12 ACSR 341 - Scope Data Systems Pty Ltd v Goman as representative of the Partnership BDO Nelson Parkhill [2007] NSWSC 278; (2007) 70 NSWLR 176 - Spencer Constructions Pty Ltd v G & M Aldridge Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACSR 785 - Steel Building Systems Pty Ltd v Beks Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1405; (2010) 245 FLR 212 Category: Principal judgment Parties: V & M Davidovic Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Professional Services Group Pty Limited t/as Rosier Partners Lawyers (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: V. Davidovic (Director of Plaintiff - in person) T. M. Dinh (Defendant) Solicitors: Rosier Partners Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 11/239782
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate