NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Allianz Australia Insurance Limited & Anor v Rose Marie Lo-Giudice [2012] NSWSC 145 Hearing dates: 24/02/2012 Decision date: 24 February 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Pembroke J Decision: See paragraph [39] Catchwords: EQUITY - mistake and fraud TORTS - conversion - drawing of cheques induced by fraud - cheques dealt with in a manner repugnant to true owner's right of possession REMEDIES - trust - stolen funds held on trust - proprietary remedy - charge over asset purchased with stolen money Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Guarantee Corp Ltd v State Bank of Victoria Commissioners [1989] VR 617 Black v S Freedman & Company (1910) 12 CLR 105 Bunnings Group Ltd v CHEP Australia Ltd [2011] NSWCA 342 Citibank Ltd v Papandony [2001] NSWCA 375 Creak v James Moore & Sons Pty Ltd (1912) 15 CLR 426 David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353 Foskett v McKeown [2001] 1 AC 102 Hunter BNZ Finance Ltd v ANZ Banking Group Ltd [1990] VR 41 Hunter BNZ Finance Ltd v CG Maloney Pty Ltd (1989) 18 NSWLR 420 Midland Bank Ltd v Reckitt [1933] AC 1 Parsons v R (1999) 195 CLR 619 Paul A Davies (Australia) Pty Ltd (in liq) v Davies [1983] 1 NSWLR 440 Penfolds Wines Pty Ltd v Elliott (1945) 74 CLR 204 Re Oatway [1903] 2 Ch 356 Robb Evans of Robb Evans & Associates v European Bank Ltd (2004) 61 NSWLR 75 Shields v Westpac Banking Corporation [2008] NSWCA 268 Westpac Banking Corporation v Ollis [2007] NSWSC 956 Westpac Banking Corporation v Palasty [2011] NSWSC 1478 Wilton v Commonwealth Trading Bank of Australia [1973] 2 NSWLR 644 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Allianz Australia Insurance Limited - first plaintiff Allianz Australia Services Pty Limited - second plaintiff Rose Marie Lo-Giudice - defendant (also known as rose Maria LoGiudice, Rose Maria Logiodice, Rosie Lucia Giudice, Rose Lo-Giodice, Rosa Tizzone Representation: Ms T L Wong - for the plaintiffs No appearance for the defendant Sparke Helmore Lawyers - for the plaintiffs No appearance for the defendant File Number(s): 2011/243553
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate