NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Madden-Smith v Madden (Estate of the late Doris Linda Madden) [2012] NSWSC 146 Hearing dates: 23 February 2012 Decision date: 16 March 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Pembroke J Decision: Claim dismissed Catchwords: SUCCESSION - Family provision order - s58(2) of Succession Act 2006 - application out of time - no sufficient cause for extension of time - solicitor's oversight not sufficient cause of itself -relevance of prejudice - order refused SUCCESSION - Family provision order - freedom of testamentary disposition - relevance of testator's appreciation of claimant's virtues, failings and needs SUCCESSION - Family provision order - s59 of Succession Act 2006 - consideration of adequate provision for proper maintenance or advancement in life -standard of living that plaintiff entitled to expect - modest award would not make meaningful contribution to plaintiff's advancement in life - testator's knowledge of plaintiff's needs, virtues and failings SUCCESSION - Family provision and maintenance - s 60 of Succession Act 2006 - discretionary factors - delay and prejudice - unreasonable conduct of proceedings - character and conduct Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bosch v Perpetual Trustee Co (Ltd) [1938] AC 463 Cetojevic v Cetojevic [2006] NSWSC 431 Charles v Charles (unreported, NSWSC, 25 March 1988) Coates v National Trustees Executors & Agency Co Ltd (1956) 95 CLR 494 De Winter v John Stone (unreported, NSWCA, 23 August 1995) Goodsell v Wellington [2011] NSWSC 1232 In Re Gilbert (1946) SR (NSW) 318 In Re Salmon [1981] Ch 167 Hastings v Hastings [2008] NSWSC 1310 Kalmar v Kalmar [2006] NSWSC 437 Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales (1961-2) 107 CLR 9 Singer v Gerghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201 Stott v Cook (1960) 33 ALJR 447 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 221 CLR 191 Warren v McKnight [1996] NSWSC 419 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Susan Madden-Smith - plaintiff Glenn Anthony Madden - defendant Representation: Counsel Ms S Orman-Hales - for the plaintiff B Hull - for the defendant Solicitors: Maggie Orman - for the plaintiff Hansteins Lawyers - for the defendant File Number(s): 2010/263333
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate