NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Adrem Nominees Pty Limited v Auburn City Council [2012] NSWLEC 1043 Hearing dates: 14 February 2012 Decision date: 28 February 2012 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Hussey C Decision: Appeal upheld, conditional consent granted Catchwords: Development application: Easement creation in riparian zone, conditions on storage of building materials on a public road Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Auburn Local Environmental Plan 2010 Auburn Development Control Plan 2010 Cases Cited: Cavasinni Constructions Pty Ltd v Fairfield City Council [2010] NSWLEC 65 Botany Bay Council v Saab Corporation Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 308 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Adrem Nominees Pty Limited (Applicant)
Auburn City Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr D Briggs (Applicant)
Mr A Hudson (Respondent) DG Briggs and Associates (Applicant)
Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 10851 of 2011
Judgment
Background 1This appeal is against council's refusal of a development application for alterations and additions to an existing industrial development, including the construction of 5 new buildings and associated works at 305 and 305A Parramatta Road, Auburn. 2For the appeal, the council initially identified a number of contention including: Site contamination risks * Flooding risks * Section 94 contribution * Easement creation. 3However, following the lodgement of additional information, the only issues contested concern the creation of a proposed 5m wide easement along the northern boundary of the property, adjacent Duck River. Also, the conditions restricting the temporary placement of building materials on the roadway.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate