NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Andrew Iskandar & R v Nita Iskandar (No. 4) [2012] NSWSC 149 Hearing dates: 17-21 October 2011; 24 - 28 October 2011; 31 October 2011 - 4 November 2011; 7 November 2011 - 11 November 2011; 14 November 2011 - 18 November 2011; 21 November 2011 - 25 November 2011; 28 November 2011 - 29 November 2011; and 2 February 2012. Decision date: 16 March 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Davies J Decision: 1. Andrew Iskandar for the murder of Mohd Shah Saemin I sentence you to a minimum term of 18 years imprisonment commencing 21 May 2010 and expiring 20 May 2028 with an additional term of 7 years expiring 20 May 2035. 2. Nita Iskandar for being an accessory after the fact to the murder of Mohd Shah Saemin I sentence you to imprisonment for 1 year 11 months and 15 days commencing 16 March 2012 and expiring 28 February 2014, such sentence to be wholly suspended. You are to enter into a bond to be of good behaviour for a period of 1 year 11 months and 15 days commencing 16 March 2012 and expiring 28 February 2013. The bond is to contain conditions: (a) that you will be of good behaviour during the term of the bond; (b) that you are to appear before the Court if called upon to do so at any time during the term of the bond; (c) that you are to accept the supervision of the Probation and Parole Service and to obey all reasonable directions for counselling and to report to the Burwood Probation office within 7 days. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - murder - guilty verdict by jury - joint criminal enterprise with father to kill mother's lover - young adult - no remorse - whether under father's influence. CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - accessory after the fact to murder - guilty verdict by jury - assistance by mother to enable son to flee the jurisdiction - knowledge of son's involvement. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: KT v R [2008] NSWCCA 51 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 R v Bolt [2001] NSWCCA 487; (2001) 126 A Crim R 284 R v Cowen [2008] NSWSC 104 R v Dawes [2004] NSWCCA 363 R v Dileski [2002] NSWCCA 345 R v Hawken (1986) 27 A Crim R 42 R v JW [2010] NSWCCA 49 R v Koloamatangi [2011] NSWCCA 288 R v Mackett [2012] NSWSC 166 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Ward [2004] NSWSC 420 Category: Principal judgment Parties: The Crown Andrew Iskandar (Accused) Nita Iskandar (Accused) Representation: Ms K Shead (Crown Prosecutor) Mr J O'Sullivan (Andrew Iskandar) Mr D G Price (Nita Iskandar)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate