NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cantwell v Sinclair [2012] NSWSC 157 Hearing dates: None - orders made in Chambers Decision date: 01 March 2012 Before: Rothman J Decision: The defendant pay the plaintiff's costs of and incidental to the proceeding: (a) Incurred in the period up to and including 11 February 2010, on a party/party basis; and (b) Incurred in the period from 12 February 2010 on an indemnity basis. Proceedings otherwise dismissed. Catchwords: COSTS - indemnity costs - offer of compromise or Calderbank letter; where - compliance with UCPR - reasonableness of rejection Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 2005 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Davis v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 946 Mundine v Brown (No 7) [2011] NSWSC 170 Category: Costs Parties: Melanie Cantwell (Plaintiff) Douglas Sinclair (Defendant) Representation: Lander & Rogers Lawyers (Plaintiff) File Number(s): 2009/297730
Judgment
Introduction 1The Court, as presently constituted, delivered judgment in this matter on 25 October 2011 and made the following orders: (i)Judgment for the plaintiff; (ii)The defendant shall pay damages in the sum of $77,750 (including interest) to the plaintiff (iii)Within seven days of the date hereof, the plaintiff shall file and serve a document setting out its claim for any order as to costs and within a further seven days thereafter, the defendant shall respond thereto. If there be no agreement, the Court shall contact the parties in order to direct written submissions and/or a short hearing on costs. 2The plaintiff and defendant's submissions were sent to Justice Rothman's Associate via email on 1 November 2011 and 9 November 2011, respectively. The plaintiff's submissions in reply were sent by email on 6 December 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate