NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Luigi Iacullo v Dominic Iacullo and Lillian Iacullo [2012] NSWSC 189 Hearing dates: 28 November to 2 December 2011; 6 to 9 December 2011 Decision date: 07 March 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Black J Decision: Trustee's determination treated as a report and findings to be adopted with a variation. Parties to be heard as to form of orders and costs. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Review of determination of trustees for sale - Jurisdiction for review - Referee's report under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Pt 20 Div 3 - Whether error of principle, patent misapprehension of evidence or perversity or manifest unreasonableness in trustee's determination. Legislation Cited: - Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s 66G - Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) Pt 20 Div 3, Pt 48 r 3 - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 20.14, r 20.24(2), r 46.4 Cases Cited: - Banabelle Electrical v State of New South Wales [2005] NSWSC 714 - Hoy Mobile Pty Ltd v Allphones Retail Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCA 810 - Powers v Stoikos [2007] NSWSC 675 - Ross v Byrne [2002] NSWSC 182 - Varma v Varma [2010] NSWSC 786 - Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Luigi Iacullo (Plaintiff) Dominic Iacullo (First Defendant) Lillian Iacullo (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G. A. Moore (Plaintiff) D. A. Smallbone (Defendant) Solicitors: Kreisson Legal (Plaintiff) Allsop Glover (Defendant) File Number(s): 2007/257124
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate