NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Llavallol v R [2012] NSWCCA 29 Hearing dates: 8 February 2012 Decision date: 09 March 2012 Before: Basten J at [1] RS Hulme J at [15] Schmidt J at [34] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal is granted. 2. The appeal is upheld. 3. The sentence is quashed and in lieu the applicant is sentenced to a non-parole period of 13 months commencing on 11 February 2011 and expiring on 10 March 2012 with a balance of term of 5 months expiring on 10 August 2012. 4. Direct that the applicant be released on parole subject to the standard conditions. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - whether error in failing to apply the provisions of the Criminal Case Conferencing Act - whether error in failing to take into account that the offence was capable of being dealt with in the Local Court - leave to appeal granted - leave upheld - sentence quashed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Case Conferencing Trial Act 2008 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Cases Cited: Do v R [2010] NSWCCA 182 Greer v R [2011] NSWCCA 40 LJ v Regina [2010] NSWCCA 289 Nguyen v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 15 Re Attorney-General's Application under s37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (No 1 of 2002) [2002] NSWCCA 518; (2002) 56 NSWLR 146 Bonwick v R [2010] NSWCCA 177 R v Clarke (Court of Criminal Appeal, 15 March 1990, unreported) R v Crombie [1999] NSWCCA 297 R v El Masri [2005] NSWCCA 167 R v Giang [2005] NSWCCA 387 R v Hanslow [2004] NSWCCA 163 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; (1999) NSWLR 346 R v Khalad [2001] NSWCCA 169 R v Kalache (2000) 111 A Crim R 152 R v Knapp [2004] NSWCCA 419 R v Kean [2011] NSWCCA 136 R v Liang (Court of Criminal Appeal, 2 June 1995, unreported) R v Markarian [2003] NSWCCA 8 R v Palmer [2005] NSWCCA 349 R v Ramos (2000) 112 A Crim R 339 R v Thompson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCC 309; (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Wong & Leung [1999] NSWCCA 420; (1999) 48 NSWLR 340 Tran v R [2010] NSWCCA 183 Wong v R [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Esteban Luis Llavallol (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Barrow (Applicant) Ms T Smith (Respondent) Solicitors: B Sandland, Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2010/116354 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2011-02-11 00:00:00 Before: Freeman DCJ File Number(s): 2010/116353
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate