NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Yeomans v Carbridge Pty Ltd [2012] NSWDC 20 Hearing dates: 29/02/2012 Decision date: 09 March 2012 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Elkaim SC DCJ Decision: See paragraph 61 Catchwords: Identity of carrier and agent under Carriage by Air legislation. Scope of agency. Legislation Cited: Civil Aviation (Air Carriers Liability) Act 1967 (NSW) Civil Aviation (Carriers Liability) Act 1959 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Guadalajara Convention 1961 Warsaw Convention (Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Transportation by Air, October 12 1929). Cases Cited: Air Link Pty Ltd v Paterson (2009) 75 NSWLR 354 Air Tahiti Nui Pty Ltd v McKenzie [2009] NSWCA 429 Kotsambasis v Singapore Airlines Ltd 148 ALR 498 Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd v Producers & Citizens Co-operative Assurance Co of Australia Ltd (1931) 46 CLR 41 Girard v American Airlines United States District Court, 2003 WL 21989978 (E.D.N.Y.) Johnson v Allied Eastern States Maintenance Corporation 488 A.2d 1341 (DC cir. 1985) Texts Cited: Shawcross and Beaumont Air Law (Loose leaf Butterworths LexisNexis) Category: Separate question Parties: Wendy Yeomans (Plaintiff) Carbridge Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: K Nomchong and E James (Plaintiff) C Withers (Defendant) Cheney & Wilson Solicitors (Plaintiff) Wotton & Kearney (Defendant) File Number(s): 2010/00146047
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate