NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: McMahon v John Fairfax Publications Pty Limited (No 4) [2012] NSWSC 216 Hearing dates: 7-10, 13-17, 20-24, 27, 28 February 2012 Decision date: 29 February 2012 Before: McCallum J Decision: Rulings on evidence Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Legal Profession Act 2004 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth). Cases Cited: National Telecoms Group Limited v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd (No 1) [2011] NSWSC 455 Ringrow Pty Ltd v BP Australia Limited [2003] FCA 933 Ritz Hotel Ltd v Charles of the Ritz (1987) 14 NSWLR 116 Roach v Page (No. 15) [2003] NSWSC 939 Roach v Page (No. 27) [2003] NSWSC 1046 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Bryan McMahon (plaintiff) John Fairfax Publications Pty Limited (first defendant) Marcus Priest (second defendant) Rachel Nickless (third defendant) Representation: B McClintock SC, K Andronos (plaintiff) ATS Dawson, L Brown (defendants) Ardent Lawyers (plaintiff) Banki Haddock Fiora Lawyers (defendants) File Number(s): 2008/289210 Publication restriction: Not to be posted on the internet until after the conclusion of the jury trial that commenced on 8 February 2012
Judgment 1These are proceedings for defamation and injurious falsehood arising out of the publication of two articles in the Australian Financial Review . The proceedings are being tried before me with a jury. 2The plaintiff has objected to a number of documents tendered by the defendants. These are my rulings and reasons in respect of those objections.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate