NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: McMahon v John Fairfax Publications Pty Limited (No 6) [2012] NSWSC 224 Hearing dates: 7-10, 13-17, 20-24, 27-29 February; 1-2, 5-9, 12, 13 March 2012 Decision date: 16 March 2012 Before: McCallum J Decision: Publication of reserved reasons as to the form of questions for the jury; for withdrawing part of the truth defence from the jury and as to the basis on which the defence of contextual truth should be left. Catchwords: DEFAMATION - defences - substantial truth - whether defence should be left to the jury - contextual truth - whether the jury should be directed to exclude consideration of such of the plaintiff's defamatory imputations as they have found to be substantially true Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 1974 Defamation Act 2005 Legal Profession Act 2004 Cases Cited: Allen v John Fairfax & Sons (NSWCA 2 December 298, unreported) Besser v Kermode [2011] NSWCA 174 Con Ange v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd & Ors [2011] NSWSC 204 John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Hitchcock [2007] NSWSC 364 McMahon v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd (No 3) [2010] NSWSC 196 McMahon v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd (No43) [2010] NSWSC 216 Mizikovsky v Queensland Television Limited (No 3) [2011] QSC 375 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Bryan McMahon (plaintiff) John Fairfax Publications Pty Limited (first defendant) Marcus Priest (second defendant) Rachel Nickless (third defendant) Representation: B McClintock SC, K Andronos (plaintiff) ATS Dawson, L Brown (defendants) Ardent Lawyers (plaintiff) Banki Haddock Fiora Lawyers (defendants) File Number(s): 2008/289210 Publication restriction: Not to be posted on the internet until after the conclusion of the jury trial that commenced on 8 February 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate