NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wesfarmers General Insurance Limited t/as Lumley Insurance v Nestel [2011] NSWDC 224 Hearing dates: 14 & 15 December 2011 Decision date: 16 December 2011 Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: 1) Appeal dismissed 2) I order the Plaintiff pay the Defendant's costs 3) I remit the matter back to the Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Catchwords: CTTT APPEAL - STATUTORY INTERPRETATION - proper construction of clause 52(3) of Home Building Regulation 2004 - question of whether person has "disappeared" if they have left territorial jurisdiction of NSW Legislation Cited: Home Building Regulation 2004, cl 2(3), 52(3), 56 Home Building Act 1989, s 18B, 42A, 90, 95, 99, 101 Interpretation Act 1987, s 5(2), 12(1), 17 Home Building Amendment (Insurance) Act 2002 Foreign Judgments Regulations 1992 Foreign Judgments Act 1991 Farm Produce Agents Act 1926 s 23(1) Home Building Amendment Act 2008 Cases Cited: Grannall v C. Geo Kellaway and Sons Proprietary Limited (1955) 93 CLR 36 Texts Cited: Pearce and Geddes, Statutory Interpretation in Australia, 7th edition (2011), [6.38] Category: Principal judgment Parties: Wesfarmers General Insurance Limited trading as Lumley Insurance (Plaintiff) John Nestel (Defendant) Representation: Mr L. Dawson (Plaintiff) Mr R. Alkadamani (Defendant) Vardanega Roberts (Plaintiff) In person (Defendant) File Number(s): 2011/317556
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate