NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Du Maurier v Wechsler No 2 [2012] NSWSC 240 Hearing dates: 15/09/11, 15/11/2011, 16/12/11, 09/02/12, 08/03/2012 Decision date: 20 March 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Associate Justice Macready Decision: (1)I dismiss the summons. (2)I will hear the parties on costs. Catchwords: TRUSTS - application for judicial advice pursuant to s 63 of the Trustee Act 1925 - whether trustee justified in defending proceedings brought by a beneficiary - whether trustee would be entitled to be paid his indemnity costs from the estate - plaintiff in substantive proceedings joined as defendant Legislation Cited: Trustee Act 1925 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Application of Gnitekram Marketing Pty Limited [2010] NSWSC 1328 Australian Pipeline Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1316 Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Incorporated v His Eminence Petar, the Diocesan Bishop of Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand [2008] HCA 42; (2008) 237 CLR 66 Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Incorporated v His Eminence Petar, the Diocesan Bishop of Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand [2006] NSWCA 160; (2006) 66 NSWLR 112 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Du Maurier (plaintiff) Katie Wechsler (defendant) Representation: Mr L Ellison SC (plaintiff) Mr D Smallbone (defendant) Gadens Lawyers (plaintiff) Hunt & Hunt (defendant) File Number(s): 2011/266500
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate