NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zany WONG v R [2012] NSWCCA 39 Hearing dates: 9 December 2011 Decision date: 05 April 2012 Before: Meagher JA at [1] Hoeben J at [2] Rothman J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted; (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - APPEAL - unreasonable verdict allegation - inconsistent verdict alleged - no reasonable doubt not resolved by juries capacity to observe the evidence - appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Alramadan v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2007] NSWCCA 322 Brendon Singh v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 100 Jones v The Queen (1997) HCA 56; 191 CLR 439 Krishna v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2007] NSWCCA 318 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; (1994) 181 CLR 487 MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53; 213 CLR 606 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Zany Wong (appellant) Regina (respondent) Representation: Counsel K Averre (for the appellant) T Smith (for the respondent) Solicitors Legal Aid (for the appellant) Director of Public Prosecutions (for the respondent) File Number(s): 2009/66126 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2010-10-01 00:00:00 Before: Williams DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate