NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Specialty Fashion Group Limited v Global Red Australia Pty Limited [2012] NSWSC 256 Hearing dates: 5 March 2012 Decision date: 21 March 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Defendant to pay the Plaintiff's costs of and incidental to the application to set aside the statutory demand and of the hearing on 5 March 2012. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - Winding up - Statutory demand - Costs - Whether costs should be awarded in respect of application to set aside statutory demand - Whether Defendant should pay Plaintiff's costs where statutory demand would almost certainly have been set aside if the matter had proceeded to a contested hearing. Legislation Cited: - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 459G, 459G(2), 459H, 459J, 459N - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 42.1 Cases Cited: - Ayrton Investments Pty Ltd v Andrlik [2000] ACTSC 55 - BGC Contracting Pty Ltd v Whitsunday Crushers Pty Ltd [2004] WASC 209 - CGI Information Systems and Management Consultants Pty Ltd v APRA Consulting Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 728; (2003) 47 ACSR 100 - Construction Management Services Pty Ltd v Bidnia Group Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1152 - Felkro Nominees Pty Ltd v Austissue Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 455; (1993) 11 ACSR 607 - Hornet Aviation Pty Ltd v Ansett International Air Freight (unreported, Federal Court of Australia, Northrop J, 6 December 1994) - Independent Portable Buildings Pty Ltd v Modular Building Systems Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 511 - Jem Number Four Pty Ltd v Southern Cross Construction (NSW) Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 692 - Lake Burrendong State Park Trust v Thompson [2011] NSWSC 1554 - Re Chameleon Mining NL; Chameleon Mining NL v Atanaskovic Hartnell [2009] NSWSC 602 - Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Quin [1997] HCA 6; (1997) 186 CLR 622 - Soudan Lane Pty Ltd v Glen Bradshaw t/as Pacific Coast Digital [2007] NSWSC 772 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Speciality Fashion Group Limited (Plaintiff) Global Red Australia Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M. A. Friedgut (Plaintiff) M. Rosenblatt (Defendant) Solicitors: Arnold Bloch Leibler (Plaintiff) Somerset Ryckmans (Defendants) File Number(s): 11/384227
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate