NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Barescape Pty Ltd & Anor v Bacchus Holdings Pty Ltd & Anor (No 6) [2012] NSWSC 257 Hearing dates: 9-12 August, 15-18 August, 6-9 September 2011, 12-16 September 2011, 12 October 2011, 9 March 2012 Decision date: 21 March 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Black J Decision: Tender of MYOB records by Defendants/Cross-Claimant allowed. Defendants/Cross-Claimant granted leave to tender identified parts of three expert's reports reserving specific objections as to admissibility of specific paragraphs of those reports to the Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants. Catchwords: EVIDENCE - Expert evidence - Expert's reports - Rules of court as to admissibility of expert's reports - Rule 31.28 of Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) - Whether "exceptional circumstances" exist supporting the admissibility of expert's reports - Whether substantial prejudice exists preventing the admission of expert's reports. EVIDENCE - Tender of MYOB records - Whether sufficient evidence exists to establish how MYOB records were prepared - Whether business records under s 69 of Evidence Act 1995 (NSW). Legislation Cited: - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56-58 - Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 69, 79, 135, 136 - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 31.26, 31.28, 31.28, 31.28(3) Cases Cited: - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich [2005] NSWSC 706 - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich [2005] NSWSC 417; (2005) 216 ALR 320 - Hodder Rock & Associates v Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance [2011] NSWCA 279 - Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305; (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 - State of New South Wales v Tyszyk [2008] NSWCA 107 - Yacoub v Pilkington (Australia) Ltd [2007] NSWCA 290 Texts Cited: - Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure NSW Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Barescape Pty Ltd atf The Vs Family Trust (First Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Anthony Ventura (Second Plaintiff/Second Cross-Defendant) Midfielder Pty Ltd (Third Cross-Defendant) Bacchus Holdings Pty Ltd atf The Bacchus Holdings Trust (First Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Matthew Gordon Higgins (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C. D. Wood (Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants) A. A. Henskens SC, N. E. Furlan (Defendants/Cross-Claimant) Solicitors: Anthony Ventura (Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants) Bilbie Dan (Defendants/Cross-Claimant) File Number(s): 09/291437
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate