NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Christopher Ronald Fitzsimons [2012] NSWSC 260 Hearing dates: 3, 31 August 2011 Decision date: 23 March 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adams J Decision: (1)The respondent is guilty of professional misconduct. (2)At the time of the commission of the misconduct particularised in paragraph 1 (a) of the summons the respondent was not a person of good fame and character. (3)I decline to make the declaration that the respondent is not a fit and proper person to remain on the local roll of lawyers of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. (4)The respondent must pay the applicant's costs. Catchwords: LEGAL PRACTITIONER - misappropriation - convicted of criminal offences - sentence completed - relevance of mental illness now controlled - whether unfit for practice. Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 2004 Cases Cited: Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v A Solicitor [2002] NSWCA 62 In Re a Practitioner (1984) 36 SASR 590 at 591 McBride v Walton [1994] NSWCA 199 (unreported, 15 July 1994) Nash v Law Society of New South Wales [1988] NSWCA 100 Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Farran [2003] NSWCA 372 Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v P [2003] NSWCA 320 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (Applicant) Christopher Ronald Fitzsimons (Respondent) Representation: P Griffin (Applicant) J Lyons (Solicitor, Respondent) Crown Solicitors (Applicant) Lyons & Lyons (Respondent) File Number(s): 2010/265686
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate