NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Richard Plunkett and Silverbrook Research Pty Limited [2012] NSWIRComm 22 Hearing dates: 23 November and 6 December 2011 Decision date: 23 March 2012 Jurisdiction: Industrial Relations Commission Before: Walton J, Vice President; Harrison DP; Tabbaa C Decision: 1. Leave to appeal is granted. 2. The appeal is upheld. 3. The decision of Connor C is set aside. 4. The matter is referred to a Member of the Commission for retrial. Catchwords: APPEAL - leave to appeal - application for reinstatement of injured worker - Part 8 of Workers Compensation Act 1987 - appellant suffered physical workplace injury to forearms - issue as to whether appellant also suffered a psychological injury - whether appellant 'injured worker' under s 240(2) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 re psychological injury - appellant dismissed by respondent for behavioural issues - question as to whether behavioural issues manifestation of psychological injury - question relevant to whether rebuttal provision of s 244(2) satisfied - issue as to whether appellant suffered compensable psychological injury critical to resolution of proceedings arising under that section - issue not resolved at first instance - appealable error - absence of reasons alternative ground of appealable error - questions of law raised by respondent for first time on appeal not determinative of issues raised re psychological injury - leave to appeal granted - appeal upheld - factors in favour of retrial - retrial ordered Legislation Cited: Industrial Relations Act 1996 Workers Compensation Act 1987 Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 Cases Cited: Commissioner of Police v Smith [2010] NSWIRComm 162 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; 9 ABC 117; 10 ALJ 22 Paula Lee v Energy Australia (No 4) [2011] NSWIRComm 120 Richard Plunkett v Silverbrook Research Pty Limited [2011] NSWIRComm 1031 Speirs v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales & Anor [2011] NSWCA 206 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Richard Plunkett (appellant) Silverbrook Research Pty Limited (respondent) Representation: M J Kimber (SC) and K Edwards of counsel (appellant) K L Eastman of counsel (respondent) Slater & Gordon Lawyers (appellant) Truman Hoyle Solicitors (respondent) File Number(s): IRC 1326 of 2011 Decision under appeal Citation: Richard Plunkett v Silverbrook Research Pty Limited [2011] NSWIRComm 1031 Date of Decision: 2011-07-14 00:00:00 Before: Connor C File Number(s): IRC 915 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate