NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Westpac Banking Corporation v Clayton [2012] NSWSC 283 Hearing dates: 07/03/12; 16/03/12; 04/04/12 Decision date: 16 April 2012 Before: Garling J Decision: 1. Judgment for the plaintiff against the first and second defendants for possession for properties identified in [149]. 2. Judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant in sum of $2,580,445.40. 3. Judgment for plaintiff against the second defendant in sum of $800,000.00 4. Leave granted to the plaintiff to issue a writ of possession forthwith in relation to each of the properties. 5. Judgment for the cross defendant on the cross-claim filed 17 November 2011. 6. Defendants/cross claimants pay plaintiff/cross defendant's costs of the whole proceedings, including any reserved costs. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY - Claim for possession of land - Mortgage default - Order for possession made - Judgment against mortgagor and guarantor - No issue of principle Legislation Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) Civil Procedure Act 2005 Real Property Act 1900 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Westpac Banking Corporation (plaintiff) Erwin John Clayton (first defendant) Mary Patricia Clayton (second defendant) Representation: Counsel; R I Bellamy (plaintiff) In person (first defendant) No appearance (second defendant) Solicitors: Gadens Lawyers (plaintiff) Self represented (first and second defendant) File Number(s): 09/295510 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate