NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Mauger [2012] NSWCCA 51 Hearing dates: 28 March 2012 Decision date: 30 March 2012 Before: Beazley JA at 1 Harrison J at 2 McCallum J at 43 Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Crown appeal against sentence - supply of ecstasy - whether sentencing judge erred in finding that respondent's mental condition was such that his judgment was impaired - whether sentencing judge erred in finding that respondent would face adverse consequences in relation to his employment and ability to travel overseas if a conviction was recorded - whether sentence was manifestly inadequate - sentence not manifestly inadequate - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Records Act 1991 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Cases Cited: Application by the Attorney General under Section 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act for a Guideline Judgment Concerning the Offence of High Range Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol Under Section 9(4) of the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 (No. 3 of 2002) [2004] NSWCCA 303; 61 NSWLR 305 Cobiac v Liddy (1969) 119 CLR 257 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; (2011) 283 ALR 1 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 Hoffenberg v The District Court of New South Wales [2010] NSWCA 142 House v R [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 R v KNL [2005] NSWCCA 260; (2005) 154 A Crim R 268 R v Nguyen [2002] NSWCCA 183 R v TMTW [2008] NSWCCA 50 SBF v R [2009] NSWCCA 231; (2009) 198 A Crim R 219 Walden v Hensler [1987] HCA 54; (1987) 163 CLR 561 Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crown (Appellant) Oliver James Tama Mauger (Respondent) Representation: S Dowling (Appellant) R Sutherland SC (Respondent) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Appellant) Armstrong Legal (Respondent) File Number(s): 2011/62157 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-11-23 00:00:00 Before: English DCJ File Number(s): 2011/62157
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate