NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Minogue v Rudd [2012] NSWSC 305 Hearing dates: 26 March 2012 - 30 March 2012 Decision date: 12 April 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: 1. Judgment for the defendants on the plaintiff's claim. 2. Dismiss all cross-claims. 3. Order the plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings, including of the cross-claims. Catchwords: TORT - breach of statutory duty - whether a breach of the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation creates a private cause of action based on breach of statutory duty
TORT - negligence - relationship between occupational health and safety legislation and tort - standard of care - standard of care owed by an employer to an employee
TORT - negligence - duty of care - employer-employee relationship - non-delegable duty of care - whether, in the circumstances, the plaintiff was an employee of the third defendant
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - pleadings - amendment - where applications to amend pleadings made at various stages in the trial - where amendment raises real issues in the proceedings Legislation Cited: - Civil Liability Act 2002 - Civil Procedure Act 2005 - Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 - Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2005 - Workers Compensation Legislation Amendment Act 2003 - Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 Cases Cited: - Adelaide Stevedoring Co Ltd v Forst [1940] HCA 45; 64 CLR 538 - Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Limited (1987) 9 NSWLR 310 - Bankstown Foundry Pty Limited v Braistina [1986] HCA 20; 160 CLR 301 - Bendix Mintex Pty Limited v Barnes (1997) 42 NSWLR 307 - Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R (HL) 67 - Condos v Clycut Pty Limited [2009] NSWCA 200 - Hollis v Vabu Pty Limited [2001] HCA 44; 207 CLR 21 - Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; 101 CLR 298 - Leighton Contractors Pty Limited v Fox [2009] HCA 35; 240 CLR 1 - Lithgow City Council v Jackson [2011] HCA 36; 85 ALJR 1130 - March v Stramare (1991) [1991] HCA 12; 171 CLR 506 - Minogue v Rudd [2011] NSWSC 966 - Rockdale Beef Pty Limited v Carey [2003] NSWCA 132 - Shellenberg v Tunnel Holdings Pty Limited [2000] HCA 18; 200 CLR 121 - Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Company Pty Limited [1986] HCA 1; 160 CLR 16 - Thompson v Woolworth's (Queensland) Pty Limited [2005] HCA 19; 221 CLR 234 - Wynn Tresidder Management Pty Limited v Barkho [2009] NSWCA 149 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Timothy Minogue (Plaintiff) David Jonathan Rudd t/as Rudd & Co Constructions (First Defendant) John Tilden (Second Defendant) DMW Carpentry Services Pty Ltd (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: B Gross QC/ R Harrington (Plaintiff) RA Cavanagh SC/ D Lloyd (First Defendant) John Tilden (Second Defendant in Person) D Hooke SC/ S Maybury (3rd Defendant) Solicitors: Carrol O'Dea (Plaintiff) Wotton Kearney (First Defendant) Edwards Michael Lawyers (Third Defendant) File Number(s): 2008/00289464
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate