NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lawson v R [2012] NSWCCA 56 Hearing dates: 30 March 2012 Decision date: 05 April 2012 Before: Beazley JA Harrison J McCallum J Decision: Leave to appeal granted Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - whether the sentencing judge erred by failing to take into consideration statistics from the Judicial Commission - whether the judge erred in the assessment of the objective seriousness of the offences - whether the judge failed to take into account relevant mitigating factors - appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Drug Misuse & Trafficking Act 1985 Weapons Prohibition Act 1988 Cases Cited: House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Louizos v R, R v Louizos [2009] NSWCCA 71 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 MLP v R (2006) 164 A Crim R 93 R v MacDonnell (2002) 128 A Crim R 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Randy Charles Lawson (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: L Rowan (Applicant) P G Ingram SC (Crown) Solicitors: John Anthony Solicitors (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/62839 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2010-09-23 00:00:00 Before: Coolahan DCJ File Number(s): 2009/62839
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate