NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v El-Zeyat and Aouad [2012] NSWSC 340 Hearing dates: 30 March 2012 Decision date: 26 April 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Johnson J Decision: I recuse myself from sitting as the trial judge at the retrial of each Accused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - murder trial - retrial of Accused following successful appeal against conviction to Court of Criminal Appeal - judge allocated retrial had been member of Court of Criminal Appeal which allowed appeal and dismissed appeal against conviction by each Accused and other persons in related appeal - judgment of judge in related appeal made findings that evidence of persons proffered as fresh evidence was not credible or plausible - Accused likely to call those persons as witnesses at retrial - application that judge recuse himself at retrial - whether reasonable apprehension of bias by reason of prejudgment - application of principles in context of trial by jury - exceptional circumstances surrounding application - judge recuses himself Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: El-Zeyat v R [2011] NSWCCA 61; 207 A Crim R 411
Darwiche v R; El-Zeyat v R; Aouad v R; Osman v R [2011] NSWCCA 62 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; 205 CLR 337 Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association [1983] HCA 17; 151 CLR 288 Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48; 201 CLR 488 Concrete Pty Limited v Parramatta Design & Developments Pty Limited [2006] HCA 55; 229 CLR 577 Antoun v The Queen [2006] HCA 2; 80 ALJR 497 R v Kearns [2003] NSWCCA 367 R v Lee [2005] QCA 122 R v Sonnet (No. 3) [2007] VSC 287 Dwayhi v R [2011] NSWCCA 67; 205 A Crim R 274 Cesan v The Queen [2008] HCA 52; 236 CLR 358 Osman v R [2006] NSWCCA 196 Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal [1990] HCA 31; 170 CLR 70 CUR24 v Director of Public Prosecutions [2012] NSWCA 65 Re JRL; Ex parte CJL [1986] HCA 39; 161 CLR 342 El Zayet v The Queen; Aouad v The Queen, Darwiche v The Queen; Osman v The Queen [2011] HCATrans 342 Michael Wilson & Partners Limited v Nicholls [2011] HCA 48; 86 ALJR 14 British American Tobacco Australia Services Limited v Laurie [2011] HCA 2; 242 CLR 283 Cornwell v The Queen [2007] HCA 12; 231 CLR 260 Texts Cited: --- Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Nasaem El-Zeyat (Accused) Ramzi Aouad (Accused) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: Mr MC Ramage QC; Mr IS McLachlan (El-Zeyat) Mr CC Waterstreet; Ms NS Carroll (Aouad) Mr CC Patrick (Crown) Solicitors: Sydney Criminal Lawyers (El-Zeyat) George Sten & Co (Aouad) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2005/2620 (El-Zeyat) 2005/2678 (Aouad)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate