NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Carney v Jones [2012] NSWSC 352 Hearing dates: 19/03/12 Decision date: 20 March 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Associate Justice Macready Decision: (1)The orders that I make are that in lieu of the legacies provided to them in the will of the deceased, that Alva Griffiths receive a legacy of $80,000 and that Clement Jones receives a legacy of $50,000. Interest is to run on the legacies at the rate provided for in the Probate and Administration Act 1898 from three months from today's date. (2)The plaintiffs' costs on a party/party basis and the defendant on an indemnity basis will be paid or retained out of the estate. (3)The exhibits can be returned. Catchwords: WILLS AND ESTATES - Succession Act 2006 - application for family provision order by two foster children of the deceased, Clement Jones and Alva Griffiths.Judith Carney has settled her claim and is no longer in the proceedings - legacies left to plaintiffs and residue to natural son of the deceased - in lieu of the legacies further provisions ordered Legislation Cited: Family Provision Act 1982 Probate and Administration Act 1898 Succession Act 2006 Cases Cited: Gorton v Parks (1989) 17 NSWLR 1 Nicholls v Hall (2007) NSW 356 Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales (Scales' case) (1962) 107 CLR 9 Re Fulop Deceased (1987) 8 NSWLR 679 Singer v Berghouse (19412) 181 CLR 201 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Judith Anne Carney (claim settled), Clement Richard Jones and Alva Mary Griffiths v Russell Jones Representation: Counsel: Mr A Hill for Clement Jones and Alva Griffiths Mr C Hodgson for defendant Solicitors: Adrian Holmes Lawyer for Judith Carney File Number(s): 2010/385604
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate