NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bardsley-Smith & Anor v Penrith City Council & Others [2012] NSWLEC 79 Hearing dates: 1-4 November 2010 and 13-14 January 2011 Decision date: 18 April 2012 Before: Sheahan J Decision: 1.The applicants' further amended summons dated 22 October 2010 is dismissed. 2.Unless a notice of motion for any further or different orders for costs is filed, by any party, within 14 days, the only order for costs will be that the applicants pay the second and third respondents' costs, on a party-party basis, as agreed or assessed. 3.All exhibits, including those to affidavits, may be returned. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT CONSENT: validity, characterisation of proposal and subsequent use pursuant to the consent, correct principles to apply, interaction of national/state regulation of pharmacy and the relevant planning regime, validity of condition imposed, severability of condition Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Health Practitioner Regulation (Adoption of National Law) Act 2009 (NSW) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act 2009 (Qld) Interpretation Act 1987 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 National Health Act 1953 (Cth) National Health Amendment (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Act 2007 (Cth) Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Act 1966 Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1996 (Industrial Land) Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 Cases Cited: Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin [1990] HCA 21; (1990) 170 CLR 1 Baulkham Hills Shire Council v O'Donnell (1990) 69 LGRA 404 Berowra RSL Community and Bowling Club Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council [2002] NSWLEC 243; (2000) 114 LGERA 345 Bob Blakemore Pty Ltd v The Anson Bay Company (Australia) Pty Ltd [1990] NSWCA 25 Botany Bay City Council v Saab Corp Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 308; (2011) 183 LGERA 228 Botany Bay City Council v Ralansaab and 7 Ors [2010] NSWLEC 225; (2010) 178 LGERA 44 Calardu Penrith Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council [2010] NSWLEC 50 Calardu Penrith Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council [2010] NSWCA 189; (2010) 174 LGERA 446 Chamwell Pty Ltd v Strathfield Council [2007] NSWLEC 114; (2007) 151 LGERA 400 Chan v Dainford Ltd [1985] HCA 15; (1985) 155 CLR 533 Collector of Customs v Chemark Services Pty Ltd (1993) 42 FCR 588; (1993) 114 ALR 531 Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment [2000] HCA 5; (2000) 199 CLR 135 Dogild v Warringah Council (2008) 158 LGERA 429 Dooralong Residents Action Group Pty Ltd v Wyong Shire Council [2011] NSWLEC 251 Egan v Hawkesbury City Council (1993) 79 LGERA 321 Foodbarn Pty Limited v Solicitor-General (1975) 32 LGRA 157 Gance v Monash CC [2010] VCAT 388 High Point Commercial Property Group Pty Ltd v Maribyrnong CC [2009] VCAT 16 Holzberger v Secretary, Department of Health & Ageing [2007] FCAFC 68; (2007) 158 FCR 586 House of Peace Pty Ltd v Bankstown City Council [2000] NSWCA 44; (2000) 48 NSWLR 498 Kang v Blue Mountains City Council [2011] NSWLEC 150 Lizzio v Ryde Municipal Council [1983] HCA 22; (1983) 155 CLR 211 Macquarie International Health Clinic Pty Ltd v University of Sydney (1998) 98 LGERA 218 Maitland City Council v Anambah Homes Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 455; (2005) 64 NSWLR 695 Maryland Development Co Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council & Anor [2001] NSWLEC 135; (2001) 115 LGERA 75 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; (1986) 162 CLR 24 Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1981] AC 578 Penrith City Council v Waste Management Authority (1990) 71 LGRA 376 Powell Holdings Pty Limited v Hornsby Shire Council [1998] NSWLEC 111 Quarry Products (Newcastle) Pty Limited and Allendale Blue Metal Pty Limited v Roads and Maritime Services (No 3) [2012] NSWLEC 57 RCM Constructions Pty Limited & Maycot Pty Limited v Ryde City Council [2004] NSWLEC 266 Royal Agricultural Society of New South Wales v Sydney City Council (1987) 61 LGRA 305 Shire of Perth v O'Keefe [1964] HCA 37; (1964) 110 CLR 529 Sutherland Shire Council v Telope Pty Ltd (1993) 85 LGERA 103 Swansea RSL Club and Rosecorp Pty Limited v Council of the City of Lake Macquarie [2006] NSWLEC 381 Tauman v Wyndham CC [2005] VCAT 2444 Terry White Chemists Australia Fair v Secretary Department of Health and Ageing [2009] FCAFC 74; (2009) 178 FCR 161 University of Sydney v South Sydney City Council (1998) 97 LGERA 186 Warringah Shire Council v Sedevcic (1987) 10 NSWLR 335 Wechsler v Auburn Council (1997) 130 LGERA 134 Western Australian Planning Commission v Temwood Holdings Pty Limited [2004] HCA 63; (2004) 221 CLR 30 Winn v Director General of National Parks and Wildlife [2001] NSWCA 17; (2001) 130 LGERA 508 Woolworths Ltd v Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Ltd (1996) 92 LGERA 244 Woolworths Ltd v Pallas Newco Pty Ltd (2004) NSWCA 422; (2004) 61 NSWLR 707 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Janis Margaret Bardsley-Smith (1st Applicant) Ian Patrick Stubbs (3rd Applicant) Penrith City Council (1st Respondent) Administration and Marketing Solutions Pty Limited (2nd Respondent) Damien Michael Gance (3rd Respondent) Representation: Mr J Robson SC with Mr C Ireland (1st and 3rd Applicants) Submitting Appearance (1st Respondent) Mr P Tomasetti SC with Mr N Eastman (2nd and 3rd Respondents) McPhee Kelshaw (1st and 3rd Applicants) Gadens Lawyers (1st Respondent) Rotstein Lockwood Reddy Lawyers (2nd and 3rd Respondents) File Number(s): 40565 of 2009
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate