NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Rahman v Dubs [2012] NSWCA 98 Hearing dates: 10 April 2012 Decision date: 10 April 2012 Before: Meagher JA (at [20]); Barrett JA (at [1]); Tobias AJA (at [21]) Decision: The notice of motion of 4 July 2011 is dismissed and Mr Rahman, the applicant, is ordered to pay the respondents' costs of that motion. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: PROCEDURE - application for order setting aside orders previously made - no matter of principle Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 18K Supreme Court Act 1970, ss 42, 43, 46B Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rr 36.15, 36.16 Cases Cited: Rahman v Riordan [2010] NSWCA 288 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Mohammad Tabibar Rahman - Applicant Rosalind Dubb - First Respondent John Hartigan - Second Respondent Shirley Alexander - Third Respondent Representation: Mohammad Tabibar Rahman, Applicant, in person T Maltz - Respondents Mohammad Tabibar Rahman, Applicant, in person Norton Rose - Respondents File Number(s): 2009/00298024
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate