NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Veritas Property Group Pty Limited v Ronali Pty Limited [2012] NSWSC 368 Hearing dates: Friday, 13 April 2012 Decision date: 13 April 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Duty List Before: White J Decision: See paras [30]-[32] of judgment. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - judgments and orders - stay of execution pending leave to appeal - consideration of strength of application for leave to appeal -- no ground established for obtaining leave - no demonstration of hardship suffered through execution of judgment
APPEAL - civil - leave to appeal from decision of Local Court - leave required -summons alleged error of fact not question of mixed law and fact - nothing in application to show magistrate erred in final decision - whether leave to appeal within overriding purpose of facilitating just, quick and cheap resolution of issues - inappropriate to remit matter back for further hearing having regard to amount at stake. Legislation Cited: Local Court Act 2007 Supreme Court Act 1970 Civil Procedure Act 2005 Cases Cited: Walton Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Veritas Property Group Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Ronali Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: S Spackman, solicitor (Plaintiff) S Robertson (Defendant) Solicitors: Robinson Legal (Plaintiff) Adams & Co Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/113447
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate