NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Reznytska v State of New South Wales [2012] NSWCA 103 Hearing dates: 13 March 2012 Decision date: 20 April 2012 Before: Young JA at [1]; Meagher JA at [46] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal refused with costs. (2) Appeal instituted without leave dismissed as incompetent. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: LEAVE TO APPEAL- verdict for the defendant in District Court based on findings of fact adverse to applicant- not established that more than $100,000 at issue- leave to appeal refused- no question of principle. Legislation Cited: Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002, s 230 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 51.22 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Mina Reznytska (Applicant) State of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
Applicant in person M Hutchings (Respondent) Solicitors:
Applicant in person I V Knight, State Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): CA 2011/400151 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-05-24 00:00:00 Before: Finnane DCJ File Number(s): 2009/338284
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate