NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Newman v R [2012] NSWCCA 69 Hearing dates: 17 April 2012 Decision date: 23 April 2012 Before: Basten JA at [1] Blanch J at [9] Beech-Jones J at [31] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Allow the appeal to the extent that the sentence on count 2 of a non-parole period of two years and nine months with a balance of term of one year and nine months should commence on 28 July 2010. (3) In consequence he will be eligible for parole on 27 April 2013 and the total sentence will expire on 27 January 2015. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentencing - disparity of sentence with co-offender - whether difference in charges precludes application of equality principle
CRIMINAL LAW - sentencing - whether sentence excessive - whether extent of accumulation excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 86 ALJR 36 Jimmy v Regina [2010] NSWCCA 60; 77 NSWLR 540 Jones v The Queen [1993] 67 ALJR 376 Lowe v The Queen [1984] HCA 46; 154 CLR 606 OM v R [2009] NSWCCA 267 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Postiglione v The Queen (1996-1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Armstrong [2001] NSWCCA 77 R v Kairouz [2005] NSWCCA 247 R v Taudevin (1996) 2 VR 402 Stanton v Regina [2008] NSWCCA 326 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Darryl Lee Newman (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate