NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ith v R [2012] NSWCCA 70 Hearing dates: 3 November 2011 Decision date: 26 April 2012 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Adams J at [65] Hoeben J at [66] Decision: Leave to appeal out of time is refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - conviction - directions on identification evidence - directions on evidence of an accomplice - whether directions must be in the precise terms of the bench book - whether a miscarriage of justice was occasioned by all the circumstances - whether leave to appeal out of time should be granted - leave to appeal out of time denied Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Criminal Appeal Rules Cases Cited: Domican v The Queen [1992] HCA 13; (1992) 173 CLR 555 Festa v The Queen [2001] HCA 72; (2001) 208 CLR 593 Hong v The Queen (2009) NSWCCA 242 R v Adams [2004] NSWCCA 279 R v Chen & Others [2002] NSWCCA 174; (2002) 130 A Crim R 300 R v Esho; R v Sako [2001] NSWCCA 415 R v Gonzalez-Betes [2001] NSWCCA 226 R v Nale [2002] NSWCCA 31 R v Sullivan 2003] NSWCCA 100 Santo v The Queen [2009] NSWCCA 269 Stanley v The Queen [2004] NSWCCA 278 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Samban Ith (Applicant) The Crown Representation: W P Lowe (Applicant) M M Cinque (Crown) Bilias & Associates (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2007/13722 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2009-03-06 00:00:00 Before: Sorby DCJ File Number(s): 2008/21/3364
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate