NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kho v R [2012] NSWCCA 71 Hearing dates: 8 March 2012 Decision date: 26 April 2012 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Johnson J at [57] Grove AJ at [58] Decision: 1. Appeal upheld. 2. The conviction in the District Court is quashed. 3.Order a new trial. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - conviction - incompetence of counsel - failure of counsel to enquire about evidence of a co-accused - admission of irrelevant evidence - whether evidence that appellant was under surveillance prior to the commission of the offence was admissible - fresh evidence - whether interruption of cross-examination by the trial judge resulted in a mistrial Legislation Cited: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Criminal Procedure Amendment (Case Management) Act 2009 Cases Cited: MRW v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 260 Nudd v The Queen [2006] HCA 9; (2006) 162 A Crim R 301 R v Boag (1994) 73 A Crim R 35 R v Saleam (1989) 16 NSWLR 14 Ratten v The Queen [1974] HCA 35; (1974) 131 CLR 510 TKWJ v The Queen [2002] HCA 46; (2002) 212 CLR124 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Chuan Tat Kho (Appellant) Crown Representation: Counsel: W Dawe QC (Appellant) J Dwyer (Crown) Solicitors: McKenzie Leamey Solicitors (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2009/139048 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2010-10-28 00:00:00 Before: Bennett DCJ File Number(s): 2009/139048
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate