NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Prime Capital Securities Pty Ltd v Laperecon Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 386 Hearing dates: 4 April 2012 Decision date: 05 April 2012 Before: McCallum J Decision: Plaintiff restrained until further order from selling security properties as mortgagee Catchwords: MORTGAGES - claim for possession of land and for money sum - cross-claim against mortgagee for unconscionable conduct - application to restrain mortgagee sale of security properties pending determination of cross-claim - whether defendants have sufficiently apparent entitlement to justify order restraining sales - balance of convenience Legislation Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) Cases Cited: A v Harden (No 1) (1984) 59 ALJR 1 American Cyanamid v Ethicon [1975] AC 396 Appleton Papers Inc v Tomasette Paper Pty Ltd [1983] 3 NSLR 208 at 216 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats [2001] HCA 63 Beecham Group Limited v Bristol Laboratory Pty Limited (1968) 118 CLR 618 Farrar v Farrars Ltd (1888) 40 Ch D 395, CA, Kolback Securities v Epoch Minity NL (1987) 8 NSWLR 533 Major v Ward (1847) 5 Hare 598 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Prime Capital Securities Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Laperecon Pty Ltd (defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Young SC (plaintiff) C Cassimatis (defendant) Solicitors: Bransgroves Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Mitry Lawyers (defendant) File Number(s): 2012/16942 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate