NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rahman v Sharpe (No 2) [2012] NSWDC 49 Hearing dates: 5 April 2012 Decision date: 05 April 2012 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Judge Peter Johnstone Decision: Paul Baram, John Hartigan and Shirley Alexander are removed as defendants. The originating process as against the 3rd, 4th & 5th defendants is set aside. The Summons is struck out. The appeal is dismissed. The plaintiff is to pay the costs of the 3rd, 4th, 5th & 6th defendants on an indemnity basis. Catchwords: COSTS ASSESSMENT - appeal from assessment by a costs assessor of party/party costs payable pursuant to court orders - inappropriate joinder of the 3rd, 4th, and 5th defendants - as against the 6th defendant, the appeal document is embarrassing and vexatious, and a clear abuse of process, and should be struck out - failure to identify any decision, let alone any error, on the part of the costs assessor on a question relating to a matter of law that could ground an appeal under s 384 of the Legal Profession Act 2004 - whether plaintiff should be given an opportunity to "re-plead" or whether the appeal should be dismissed summarily in its entirety Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Business Names Act 2002 Civil Procedure Act 2005 Legal Profession Act 2004 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (UCPR) Cases Cited: Cassegrain v CTK Engineering [2008] NSWSC 457 Dobell v Blue Haven Pools and Spas Pty Limited [2009] NSWCA 77 Gorczynski v AWM Dickinson & Son [2005] NSWSC 277 Lions v Wende [2007] NSWSC 100 McCausland v Surfing Hardware International Holdings Pty Ltd [2010] NSWDC 222 Randall Pty Limited v Willoughby City Council [2009] NSWDC 118 Young v Annis-Brown [2011] NSWSC 475 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Mohammad Tabibar Rahman (Plaintiff) John Sharpe (1st Defendant) James Howard (2nd Defendant) Paul Baram (3rd Defendant) John Hartigan (4th Defendant) Shirley Alexander (5th Defendant) Rosalind Dubs (6th Defendant) Representation: Mr M Rahman (Plaintiff in person) Ms Z Hannaford (1st & 2nd Defendants) Ms Ormond (3rd, 4th, 5th & 6th Defendants) File Number(s): 2012/69814 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate