NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Baghdadi v R (No 2) [2012] NSWCCA 77 Hearing dates: On papers Decision date: 03 May 2012 Before: Campbell JA at [1] RS Hulme J at [26] Hoeben J at [27] Decision: (1) Set aside Orders 5 and 6 made by the Court in this matter on 26 October 2011. (2) Enter a verdict of acquittal on each charge. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal - Application for reconsideration - Criminal Appeal Rules 50C - New trial order revoked and acquittal ordered
EVIDENCE - Evidence Act 1995, s 98 - coincidence - insufficient similarities Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Appeal Rules Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: AK v Western Australia (2008) 232 CLR 438 Baghdadi v R [2011] NSWCCA 234 Jones v The Queen (1989) 166 CLR 409 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53; (2002) 213 CLR 606 SKA v R [2011] HCA 13; (2011) 243 CLR 400 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Abdul BAGHDADI (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: I McClintock SC; K Edwards (Appellant) S Dowling; C Alexander (the Crown) Elie Rahme & Associates (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (the Crown) File Number(s): 2007/14512; 2007/15272 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2009-08-21 00:00:00 Before: Armitage DCJ File Number(s): 2007/14512
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate