NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Jarrett [2012] NSWCCA 81 Hearing dates: 23 April 2012 Decision date: 07 May 2012 Before: Basten JA at [1] Blanch J at [2] Hall J at [20] Decision: (1) The Crown appeal be allowed. (2) The order rejecting the confessions be set aside. (3) The case be remitted to the District Court at Lismore for trial. Catchwords: Criminal law - s5F appeal by Crown against rejection of evidence substantially weakening prosecution case
Criminal law - relevant evidence is necessary to reject confession on the basis of unfairness under s90 Evidence Act 1995. Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Crimes Act 1900 Evidence Act 1995 Mental Health Act 2007 Cases Cited: R v Shamouil [2006] NSWLR 228 Em v The Queen (2007) 232 CLR 67; [2007] HCA 46 R v Medcalfe [2002] ACTSC 83 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Applicant) John Charles Jarrett (Respondent) Representation: N Noman (Applicant) D Imlah (Respondent) S Kavanagh (Applicant) File Number(s): 2009/158211 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Citation: R v John Charles Jarrett Date of Decision: 2011-10-31 00:00:00 Before: Black QC DCJ File Number(s): 2009/158211
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate