NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Aitchison v R [2012] NSWCCA 82 Hearing dates: 23 April 2012 Decision date: 07 May 2012 Before: Basten JA at [1] Blanch J at [2] Hall J at [19] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Allow the appeal and quash the sentence and non-parole period imposed in the District Court. (3) Impose a sentence of a non-parole period of four years and six months to date from 29 June 2010 to expire 28 December 2014 with a balance of term of two years and six months. Catchwords: Criminal law - sentencing - standard non-parole period - role of judge in assessing objective seriousness - significance of standard non-parole period Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44 R v Koloamatangi [2011] NSWCCA 288 Ayshow v R [2011] NSWCCA 240 Carroll v The Queen [2009] HCA 13; 254 CLR 259 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Robert Allan Aitchison (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: T Gartelman (Applicant N Noman (Respondent) B Sandland (Applicant) S Kavanagh (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/55287 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Citation: R v Robert Alan Aitchison Date of Decision: 2010-08-25 00:00:00 Before: Frearson SC DCJ File Number(s): 2009/55287
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate