NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bruce Maples v Siteberg [2012] NSWSC 435 Hearing dates: 30/04/12 Decision date: 30 April 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: McDougall J Decision: Application for stay dismissed with costs Catchwords: PROCEDURE - civil - interlocutory issues - stay of proceedings - whether defendant entitled to stay of proceedings pursuant to UCPR r 12.10; s 67 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW); or the Court's inherent power pending costs orders paid in other proceedings on basis of unpaid costs in other proceedings. Cases Cited: Bowen v Hickey (1958) 78 WN (NSW) 820 CGU Insurance Limited v Watson [2007] NSWCA 301 Dunbee Limited v Gilman & Co (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 2) [1969] 1 NSWR 406 Martin v Earl Beauchamp (1883) 25 Ch Div 12 Rice v Henley (1915) 32 WN (NSW) 54 Siteberg v Maples [2010] NSWSC 1344 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Bruce John Maples (Plaintiff) Siteberg Pty Limited (ACN 052 317 414) (First Defendant) John Abrar Tenish (Second Defendant) Sevim Tenish (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: T G Feerick (Solicitor) (Plaintiff) S A Benson (First Defendant) Solicitors: Frontier Law Group (Plaintiff) Crisp Legal (First, Second and Third Defendants) File Number(s): 2011/180205
Judgment 1HIS HONOUR: The first defendant (Siteberg) moves for an order that the proceedings be stayed until the plaintiff (Mr Maples) pays costs that have been ordered to be paid by him, and have been assessed, in other proceedings.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate